From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of DeLuca v. O'Kelly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 14, 1943
266 App. Div. 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)

Opinion

June 14, 1943.

Appeal from an order entered on the accounting of a receiver in supplementary proceedings insofar as it directs the payment to the judgment creditors of $2,669.71 and denies the claim of the judgment debtor to such moneys.


Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The sections of the Civil Practice Act to which the judgment debtor seeks to relegate the judgment creditors only concern moneys currently due or about to become due to the judgment debtor. The moneys directed to be paid over to the judgment creditors are not exempt from levy under execution under any of the statutes which the judgment debtor invokes. See Hayward v. Hayward ( 178 App. Div. 92, 93) where it was said: "It is quite true that a fund representing a salary earned, whether in the possession of the employer or of the employee, or of a third person, is not exempt from levy under execution, and that such fund may be seized wherever found." Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of DeLuca v. O'Kelly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 14, 1943
266 App. Div. 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)
Case details for

Matter of DeLuca v. O'Kelly

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ALBERT DeLUCA et al., Judgment Creditors, Respondents, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 14, 1943

Citations

266 App. Div. 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)

Citing Cases

Matter of Gill v. Schwartz

" While a fund representing wages earned is not exempt from levy under execution ( Matter of DeLuca v.…

In re Edelman

" The cases of DeLuca v. O'Kelly, 266 App. Div. 859, 42 N.Y.S.2d 468 and Gill v. Schwartz, 273 App. Div. 606,…