From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Delaney v. Power

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Aug 21, 1963
19 A.D.2d 779 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Summary

In Delaney, the Appellate Division commented on Greitzer and stated that the mechanical limitations under Greitzer have now been removed.

Summary of this case from Matter of Cooke v. Lomenzo

Opinion

August 21, 1963


Order entered August 20, 1963, unanimously reversed on the law and petition dismissed, without costs. The statute (Election Law, §§ 242-a, 248) does not mandate in the case of machines the use of "slate" voting in primary elections. On the contrary, the provisions of the statute relating to the arrangement of the ballots for use in primary elections prescribe the use of the so-called "Massachusetts form" of primary ballot. (See Election Law, § 108.) Matter of Greitzer v. Power ( 10 A.D.2d 921) sustained the exercise of discretion in the Board of Elections based on mechanical limitations of the voting machine formerly in use. The mechanical limitations having been now removed, the board's discretion was properly exercised within the scope of the provisions of section 242-a of the Election Law.

Concur — Botein, P.J., Breitel, Rabin, Stevens and Eager, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Delaney v. Power

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Aug 21, 1963
19 A.D.2d 779 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

In Delaney, the Appellate Division commented on Greitzer and stated that the mechanical limitations under Greitzer have now been removed.

Summary of this case from Matter of Cooke v. Lomenzo
Case details for

Matter of Delaney v. Power

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of GEORGE DELANEY et al., Respondents, v. JAMES M. POWER et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Aug 21, 1963

Citations

19 A.D.2d 779 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Citing Cases

Matter of Cooke v. Lomenzo

In Greitzer, which was a primary election, the Appellate Division affirmed the dismissal of a petition…