From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dechamps v. Sweet Home Central School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 2, 1990
158 A.D.2d 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

February 2, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Francis, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Denman, Green, Lawton and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: In this proceeding to vacate an arbitration award, petitioner claims that the arbitrator "exceeded his power" (CPLR 7511 [b] [1] [iii]). Supreme Court denied petitioner's application to vacate the award. We affirm.

An arbitration award may be vacated on the ground that the arbitrator "exceeded his power" (CPLR 7511 [b] [1] [iii]) but his determination will not be set aside on that ground unless it is "'completely irrational'" (Rochester City School Dist. v Rochester Teachers Assn., 41 N.Y.2d 578, 582; see also, Matter of National Cash Register Co. [Wilson], 8 N.Y.2d 377, 383). We conclude that, on this record, the arbitrator's award cannot be said to be "'completely irrational'".


Summaries of

Dechamps v. Sweet Home Central School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 2, 1990
158 A.D.2d 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Dechamps v. Sweet Home Central School District

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CAROL DECHAMPS, Appellant, v. SWEET HOME CENTRAL SCHOOL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 2, 1990

Citations

158 A.D.2d 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
551 N.Y.S.2d 431

Citing Cases

Utica First Ins. v. Repub. Franklin Ins.

Generally, Arbitrator's Awards may not be set aside unless the award is completely irrational. De Champs v.…

Sheehan v. Suffolk Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

The grounds are (1) that the rights of a party were prej udiced by corruption, fraud or misconduct in…