From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of DeBerardinis v. Sunderland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 20, 2000
277 A.D.2d 187 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion


277 A.D.2d 356 717 N.Y.S.2d 892 Jonathan A. Korn, Appellant-Respondent, v. First UNUM Life Insurance Company, Respondent-Appellant, and Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, Respondent. Supreme Court of New York, Second Department November 20, 2000.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals (1), as limited by his brief, from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), entered September 24, 1999, as denied his cross motion for summary judgment on the complaint, and (2) from an order of the same court, entered September 24, 1999, which denied his motion to preclude the defendant First UNUM Life Insurance Company from using certain affidavits and exhibits in support of its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it, and the defendant First UNUM Life Insurance Company cross-appeals from so much of the order and judgment as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States is awarded one bill of costs payable by the appellant-respondent.

The Supreme Court properly denied the motion of the defendant First UNUM Life Insurance Company for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it and the plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment on the complaint. There are issues of fact as to whether the plaintiff's occupation was that of an orthopedic surgeon and whether he was "totally disabled" within the meaning of the disability income insurance policies (see, CPLR 3212 [b]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562; McGrail v Equitable Life Assur. Socy., 292 N.Y. 419, 425; Godesky v First Unum Life Ins. Co., 239 A.D.2d 547).

The parties' remaining contentions are without merit.

Santucci, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of DeBerardinis v. Sunderland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 20, 2000
277 A.D.2d 187 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Matter of DeBerardinis v. Sunderland

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF DONALD J. DeBERARDINIS, APPELLANT, v. CAROLEE SUNDERLAND…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 20, 2000

Citations

277 A.D.2d 187 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
277 A.D.2d 187
717 N.Y.S.2d 892

Citing Cases

Avella v. Johnson

This we may not do. The requirement that the date—the “day and year”—accompany those signatures is a matter…

Carroll v. Thomas

Line 1 of Page 87 is dated "03/25/26" which is a date that does not yet exist in time and does not…