From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

De Luise v. Gliedman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 11, 1985
65 N.Y.2d 916 (N.Y. 1985)

Opinion

Decided July 11, 1985

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Ira Gammerman, J.

Robert J. Anderson for appellant.

Frederick A.O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel ( Stephen J. McGrath and Gillian Sacks of counsel), for Anthony Gliedman, as Commissioner of the New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development, respondent.

Mark Walfish for E O Associates, respondent.


On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs. We conclude that the determination was supported by substantial evidence and that there was no abuse of discretion as a matter of law.


Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER and TITONE.


Summaries of

De Luise v. Gliedman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 11, 1985
65 N.Y.2d 916 (N.Y. 1985)
Case details for

De Luise v. Gliedman

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of GINA DE LUISE, Individually and as President of 2765-69…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 11, 1985

Citations

65 N.Y.2d 916 (N.Y. 1985)
493 N.Y.S.2d 456
483 N.E.2d 131

Citing Cases

Bryant Avenue Tenants' Association v. Koch

The HPD notice concerning defendant Donmay Realty Co.'s application, the letter from defendant landlord David…

Allerton Assn. v. Biderman

In Matter of Laureano v. Koch ( 100 A.D.2d 192, 198, revd on other grounds 64 N.Y.2d 1105), this Court…