From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daye v. McCoy

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 2, 1972
290 N.E.2d 824 (N.Y. 1972)

Opinion

Argued October 5, 1972

Decided November 2, 1972

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, ANTHONY M. LIVOTI, J.

Francis L. Giordano for all petitioners-appellants.

Lawrence N. Marcus for Thomas F. McCoy, appellant-respondent in first above-entitled proceeding and respondent in second above-entitled proceeding.



In first above-entitled proceeding: On the appeal by petitioner: Order affirmed, without costs. On the appeal by respondent: Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that respondent is not aggrieved by the modification at the Appellate Division (CPLR 501, subd. [a], par. [iii]; Barber Bennett v. State of New York, 27 N.Y.2d 738). No opinion.

In second above-entitled proceeding: Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL and JASEN. Chief Judge FULD and Judge GIBSON taking no part.


Summaries of

Daye v. McCoy

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 2, 1972
290 N.E.2d 824 (N.Y. 1972)
Case details for

Daye v. McCoy

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ALBERT D. DAYE, Respondent-Appellant, v. THOMAS F. McCOY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 2, 1972

Citations

290 N.E.2d 824 (N.Y. 1972)
290 N.E.2d 824
338 N.Y.S.2d 624

Citing Cases

Matter of Roistacher v. McCoy

A rash of article 78 proceedings, of which this is one, broke out as a result of respondent's decisions…

Zachary v. Macy Co.

To the extent, however, that these actions further make claim to declaratory and injunctive relief, the…