From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Davidowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 6, 1942
264 App. Div. 804 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

Opinion

May 6, 1942.

Appeal from Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.

Present — Hill, P.J., Crapser, Bliss, Schenck and Foster, JJ.


The sole issue presented is whether Fanny Schwartz was the employer of claimant or whether claimant was employed by Fanny Schwartz and George Schwartz, copartners. If George Schwartz was a partner of Fanny Schwartz, the copartneship did not have four employees. If, however, Fanny Schwartz was an individual employer, she did have four employees, including George Schwartz, it being conceded that three persons were employed in the store. The Board's decision that George Schwartz was an employee and not a partner of Fanny Schwartz is substantiated by ample legal evidence. The decision of the Board should be affirmed. Decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board unanimously affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Davidowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 6, 1942
264 App. Div. 804 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)
Case details for

Matter of Davidowitz

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim for Benefits under Article 18 of the Labor Law…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 6, 1942

Citations

264 App. Div. 804 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)