From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Darrow v. D'Elia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1976
54 A.D.2d 905 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

November 1, 1976


Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, dated December 2, 1975, which, after a fair hearing, affirmed a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the Nassau County Department of Social Services, which reduced petitioner's grant of public assistance by changing the category of assistance she received from aid to dependent children to home relief. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. A review of the entire record discloses that there is substantial evidence to support the determination under review. Under the circumstances, this court is without power to interfere (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222; Matter of Collins v Codd, 38 N.Y.2d 269). Matter of Uhrovick v Lavine ( 43 A.D.2d 481, affd 35 N.Y.2d 892) merely held that a social services agency could not presume that the income of a stepparent in the house was available for the support of the stepchildren. Here, the finding of the agency is supported by the facts that (1) the family was living together, (2) the household furniture was shared in common, (3) the husband was paying the gas and electric bills and (4) the husband and wife had a joint checking account. Martuscello, Acting P.J., Latham, Cohalan, Margett and Shapiro, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Darrow v. D'Elia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1976
54 A.D.2d 905 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Matter of Darrow v. D'Elia

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CAROLE DARROW, Petitioner, v. JOSEPH D'ELIA, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1976

Citations

54 A.D.2d 905 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

Murray v. Toia

In determining financial eligibility, it has been held that under the Federal regulations ( 45 C.F.R. §…

Matter of Steward v. Krauskopf

However, our State Constitution itself "imposes upon the State an affirmative duty to aid the needy,"…