From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Daniels v. Daniels

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 2, 2003
309 A.D.2d 1174 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

CAF 02-00757

October 2, 2003.

Appeal from an order of Family Court, Erie County (Townsend, J.), entered March 7, 2002, which dismissed the petition seeking a change in custody.

CHARLES J. GREENBERG, BUFFALO, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

JOSEPH C. BANIA, LAW GUARDIAN, BUFFALO, FOR DORIAN D., JR.

PRESENT: GREEN, J.P., HURLBUTT, GORSKI, LAWTON, AND HAYES, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

Family Court properly dismissed the petition seeking a change in custody at the close of petitioner's case. Even accepting as true petitioner's proof, affording petitioner every favorable inference to be drawn therefrom and resolving questions of credibility in his favor ( see Matter of Le Blanc v. Morrison, 288 A.D.2d 768, 770), we conclude that petitioner failed to make a prima facie "showing of a change in circumstances which reflects a real need for change to ensure the best interest of the child" ( Matter of Irwin v. Neyland, 213 A.D.2d 773, 773; see Matter of Zito v. Pfohl, 302 A.D.2d 918; Matter of Dordell v. Dordell, 234 A.D.2d 868, 869).


Summaries of

Matter of Daniels v. Daniels

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 2, 2003
309 A.D.2d 1174 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Matter of Daniels v. Daniels

Case Details

Full title:MATTER OF DORIAN DANIELS, SR., PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. CELESTE M…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 2, 2003

Citations

309 A.D.2d 1174 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
764 N.Y.S.2d 897

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Whitford v. Grandinetti

Memorandum: We reject petitioner's contention that Family Court erred in continuing the existing custody…

In the Matter of Guinta v. Doxtator

This Court previously has written that "'[a] party seeking a change of custody bears a heavy burden of proof…