From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Danielle T

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 25, 1997
242 A.D.2d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

September 25, 1997

Appeal from Family Court, New York County (Edward Kaufman, J.).


Respondent's excuse for his default was properly rejected by the court as "contrived, unpersuasive, and unbelievable". In any event, respondent failed to show a meritorious defense to either the evidence that he had permanently neglected the child despite the agency's diligent efforts ( see, Matter of Sheila G., 61 N.Y.2d 368, 384-385) or that termination of his parental rights is in the child's best interests ( see, Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 N.Y.2d 136, 147-148).

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Ellerin, Williams, Tom and Colabella, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Danielle T

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 25, 1997
242 A.D.2d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Danielle T

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DANIELLE T., a Child Alleged to be Permanently Neglected…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 25, 1997

Citations

242 A.D.2d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
663 N.Y.S.2d 819

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Simone V

Respondent demonstrated neither a reasonable excuse nor a meritorious defense in support of her motion to…