From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Daniel v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 3, 1989
147 A.D.2d 896 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

February 3, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Cayuga County, Contiguglia, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Doerr, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously vacated on the law, determination confirmed and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from a judgment that dismissed his CPLR article 78 petition challenging a determination following a Tier II disciplinary hearing that he violated an inmate rule by damaging a book from the prison law library. Since an issue raised by petitioner is whether the determination is supported by substantial evidence, Special Term should not have ruled on the legal issues raised and should have transferred the matter to this court (see, CPLR 7804 [g]; Matter of Davis v Kelly, 145 A.D.2d 950). Since the matter is now properly before us, however, we may decide the issues de novo (see, Matter of Smith v Coughlin, 111 A.D.2d 503). The misbehavior report and the evidence presented at the hearing constitute substantial evidence in support of the determination (see, People ex rel. Vega v Smith, 66 N.Y.2d 130). We have considered petitioner's remaining claims and find each one lacking in merit.


Summaries of

Matter of Daniel v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 3, 1989
147 A.D.2d 896 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Matter of Daniel v. Coughlin

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PATRICK DANIEL, Appellant, v. THOMAS A. COUGHLIN, III, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 3, 1989

Citations

147 A.D.2d 896 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
537 N.Y.S.2d 358

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Whitfield v. Fischer

We disagree. Contrary to the respondent's contention, the charge against the petitioner was not established…

In re Appl. of Nedd-Miller v. Novello

Whether that determination was appropriate will necessarily depend upon a resolution of whether the record of…