From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Daly v. Wallace

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 31, 1956
2 A.D.2d 871 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)

Opinion

October 31, 1956

Appeal from the Niagara Special Term.

Present — McCurn, P.J., Vaughan, Wheeler, Williams and Bastow, JJ.


Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Memorandum: Upon the present record the decision of Special Term was correct. The only factual issue that might have presented a triable issue was the right of petitioner to be restored to the position of housing project manager of Hyde Park Village Project. The answer did not contain any denials of the allegations of the petitioner upon this subject but might be construed as alleging facts in an attempt to litigate this factual issue. Section 1291 of the Civil Practice Act requires, however, that affidavits be submitted with the answer showing such evidentiary facts as entitle respondents to a trial of any issue of fact. This was not done and Special Term properly disposed of the matter in the same manner as upon a motion for summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice ( Matter of Rotkiewicz v. Department of Mental Hygiene, 283 App. Div. 458, 461, affd. 307 N.Y. 847). All concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Daly v. Wallace

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 31, 1956
2 A.D.2d 871 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)
Case details for

Matter of Daly v. Wallace

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOHN A. DALY, Respondent, against WALTER WALLACE et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 31, 1956

Citations

2 A.D.2d 871 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)

Citing Cases

Matter of Unger v. Nugent

Under these circumstances, this court, following the requirements of section 1291 of the Civil Practice Act,…