From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Czerwiak v. Wing

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 1997
245 A.D.2d 1098 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

December 31, 1997

Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Hayes, Callahan and Fallon, JJ.


Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Substantial evidence supports respondents' determination that petitioner was not eligible to receive food stamps in January and February 1996 because the resources available to her at that time exceeded $2,000 ( see, 18 NYCRR 387.9 [b] [1]). Substantial evidence also supports the determination disqualifying petitioner from participation in the food stamp program for 12 months on the ground that she transferred those resources for the purpose of qualifying for food stamp benefits ( see, 18 NYCRR 387.9 [a] [6] [iii]). The testimony of petitioner and her mother that the resources were not available to petitioner and that they were transferred for another purpose presented credibility issues; respondents did not err in resolving them against petitioner ( see, Matter of Perry v. Municipal Civ. Serv. Commn., 191 A.D.2d 971, 971-972, lv denied 82 N.Y.2d 653; Matter of Mallia v. Webb, 103 A.D.2d 559, 563). (CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Oswego County, Nicholson, J.)


Summaries of

Matter of Czerwiak v. Wing

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 1997
245 A.D.2d 1098 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Czerwiak v. Wing

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RENEE CZERWIAK, Petitioner, v. BRIAN WING, as Acting…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 31, 1997

Citations

245 A.D.2d 1098 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
667 N.Y.S.2d 544

Citing Cases

Matter of Smith v. Wing

Contrary to the contention of petitioner, it is readily inferable therefrom that she acted intentionally (…