From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Cynlinda

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 20, 1997
243 A.D.2d 631 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

October 20, 1997

Appeal from the Family Court, Kings County (Pearce, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the fact-finding order dated June 21, 1996, is vacated, and the matter is remitted to Family Court, Kings County, for further proceedings in accordance herewith.

It was an abuse of discretion to deny the mother's request for a continuance to produce the testimony of her treating physician who was not in court because the hearing progressed more quickly than anticipated by her counsel. Under the circumstances here presented, where the statute affords the mother the absolute right to present medical evidence ( see, Social Services Law § 384-b [e]) and where the issue was the termination of her parental rights, the court's denial of a continuance was error ( see, People v. Foy, 32 N.Y.2d 473).

In light of our holding that the mother was denied the right to present her full case upon these proceedings, the matter must be remitted to the Family Court, Kings County, and the hearing reopened for the taking of further evidence and for the court to make new findings of fact based upon the record as so expanded or, in the court's discretion, for a de novo hearing.

O'Brien, J.P., Thompson, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Cynlinda

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 20, 1997
243 A.D.2d 631 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Cynlinda

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOY CYNLINDA C. ST. CHRISTOPHER-JENNIE CLARKSON CHILD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 20, 1997

Citations

243 A.D.2d 631 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
663 N.Y.S.2d 249

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Joseph Albert R

Under these circumstances, the Family Court should have denied the petitions and dismissed the proceedings.…

In re Destiny G.

The determination whether to grant a request for an adjournment for any purpose is a matter resting within…