From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Cushion v. Gorski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 7, 1991
174 A.D.2d 993 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

June 7, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Ostrowski, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Boomer, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion denied, petition reinstated and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings, in accordance with the following Memorandum: Petitioner was employed in the civil service position of Executive Deputy Commissioner of the Erie County Department of Social Services. With the adoption of Erie County's 1989 budget, however, her position was abolished. While a public employer may in good faith abolish a civil service position for reasons of economy or efficiency (see, Matter of Aldazabal v Carey, 44 N.Y.2d 787; Matter of Wipfler v Klebes, 284 N.Y. 248; Matter of O'Donnell v Kirby, 112 A.D.2d 936), a position may not be abolished as a subterfuge to avoid the statutory protection afforded to civil servants (see, Switzer v Sanitary Dist. No. 7, 59 A.D.2d 889, 890, appeal dismissed 43 N.Y.2d 845). The issue whether petitioner's position was abolished in good faith cannot be resolved on the moving papers. A trial is required (see, Matter of Terrible v County of Rockland, 81 A.D.2d 837, 838).


Summaries of

Matter of Cushion v. Gorski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 7, 1991
174 A.D.2d 993 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Matter of Cushion v. Gorski

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LAURICE R. CUSHION, as Executive Deputy Commissioner of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 7, 1991

Citations

174 A.D.2d 993 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Citing Cases

Matter of Rosenthal v. Gilroy

job position as a subterfuge to avoid the statutory protection afforded to civil servants (see, Wood v. City…

Hartman v. Erie 1 Boces Board of Education

Supreme Court erred in dismissing that part of the petition alleging that petitioner's position was abolished…