From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Curen v. Collins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 1, 1935
245 App. Div. 885 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Opinion

September, 1935.

Present — Hill, P.J., McNamee, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.


The only question presented by the record is whether Luke J. Collins was claimant's employer. On April 3, 1933, claimant while engaged in loading timber on a railroad car sustained accidental injuries. In the employer's first report of injury he admitted that he was claimant's employer. In a supplemental report he made the same admission. Claimant testified unequivocally that Collins employed him. There is evidence to sustain the finding of the Industrial Board that Collins was the employer. Award unanimously affirmed with costs to the State Industrial Board.


Summaries of

Matter of Curen v. Collins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 1, 1935
245 App. Div. 885 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Case details for

Matter of Curen v. Collins

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of FLOYD VAN CUREN, Respondent, against LUKE J…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 1, 1935

Citations

245 App. Div. 885 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)