Opinion
August 18, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
On the record before us and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, we conclude that the judgment appealed from should be affirmed ( see, Matter of Kelly v. Curcio, 180 A.D.2d 737, 738).
The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the petitioner's motion to disqualify the attorney for the appellant George Lessler ( see, Tekni-Plex, Inc. v. Meyner Landis, 89 N.Y.2d 123).
Rosenblatt, J.P., Miller, Ritter and Sullivan, JJ., concur.