From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Cty. of Nassau v. 408 Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 29, 2001
283 A.D.2d 644 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Argued May 8, 2001.

May 29, 2001.

In a condemnation proceeding, the condemnee appeals, on the ground of inadequacy, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Adams, J.), entered February 15, 2000, as, after a nonjury trial, awarded it only $20,000 for the fee taking.

Flower, Medalie Markowitz, Bay Shore, N.Y. (Donald Markowitz of counsel), for appellant.

Alfred F. Samenga, County Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Gennaro L. Pasquale of counsel), for respondent.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, LEO F. McGINITY, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly assessed the damages in this case. The general rule in New York is that a property condemned by the government is valued as of the date of its actual taking (see, Wolfe v. State of New York, 22 N.Y.2d 292). Where there is a partial taking of land, the court will generally measure damages by finding the difference between the fair market value of the whole before the taking and the fair market value of the remainder after the taking (see, Acme Theaters v. State of New York, 26 N.Y.2d 385, 388; see also, Carillion Realty v. State of New York, 158 Misc.2d 810, affd 212 A.D.2d 660).

The condemnee bought the subject gasoline station in January 1986, and replaced its illegal underground tanks by March 1986. In the process of construction, it eliminated one of the property's two pump islands. The County condemned a strip of the claimant's land 4 1/2 years later, on December 20, 1990. There is no merit to the claimant's assertion that the shadowy threat of this future condemnation forced it to reduce its business from two gasoline pump islands to one (see, City of Buffalo v. Clement Co., 28 N.Y.2d 241; Matter of County of Nassau [Scaringtown Road], 68 Misc.2d 405). This is not a case where the condemnee was justified in mitigating damages under threat of a certain and imminent appropriation (cf., Wilmot v. State, 32 N.Y.2d 164; Matter of County of Schenectady [Pahl], 194 A.D.2d 1004; Conn Realty Corp. v. State of New York, 44 A.D.2d 892). In any event, the record does not support the condemnee's contention that the narrow strip of property actually taken by the County in December 1990 would have forced it to remove its second pump island.

RITTER, J.P., FRIEDMANN, McGINITY and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Cty. of Nassau v. 408 Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 29, 2001
283 A.D.2d 644 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Matter of Cty. of Nassau v. 408 Realty Corp.

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF COUNTY OF NASSAU, respondent, v. 408 REALTY CORP.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 29, 2001

Citations

283 A.D.2d 644 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
725 N.Y.S.2d 95

Citing Cases

Vill. of Haverstraw v. Ray River Co.

Matter of Village of Port Chester [Bologna], 95 A.D.3d 895, 896, 943 N.Y.S.2d 575 ), the owner did not make…

In Matter of City of New York

The Law As contended by the City, it is beyond dispute that the measure of just compensation in an eminent…