From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Ct., Syracuse v. St. Bd., Eql. Assmt

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 19, 1985
476 N.E.2d 999 (N.Y. 1985)

Opinion

Argued February 4, 1985

Decided March 19, 1985

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, George L. Cobb, J.

Marshall G. Kaplan, Andrew S. Fisher and Ellen M. Levanti for appellants.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General ( John Q. Driscoll and Robert Hermann of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs. We affirm for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 101 A.D.2d 653) and agree with that court that the method used in calculating the equalization rate was rational and the rate fixed was supported by substantial evidence.

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE and ALEXANDER.


Summaries of

Matter of Ct., Syracuse v. St. Bd., Eql. Assmt

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 19, 1985
476 N.E.2d 999 (N.Y. 1985)
Case details for

Matter of Ct., Syracuse v. St. Bd., Eql. Assmt

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the CITY OF SYRACUSE et al., Appellants, v. STATE BOARD…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 19, 1985

Citations

476 N.E.2d 999 (N.Y. 1985)
476 N.E.2d 999
487 N.Y.S.2d 554

Citing Cases

Pleasant Val. v. Real Prop. Bd.

centrally relevant to a determination of whether the establishment of the equalization rate was rational and…

Town of Marbletown v. N.Y.S. Board

State Bd. of Real Prop. Servs., 272 A.D.2d 657, 658, 659,lv denied 95 N.Y.2d 761). With the burden upon…