From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Crowell v. American Fruit Growers, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 18, 1930
171 N.E. 774 (N.Y. 1930)

Summary

In Matter of Crowell v. American Fruit Growers, Inc. (253 N.Y. 543) it appeared that the claimant's son was employed by the American Fruit Growers, Inc., to solicit business in the village of Milton among other places.

Summary of this case from Shauntz v. Schwegler Brothers, Inc.

Opinion

Argued February 11, 1930

Decided March 18, 1930

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

Joseph F. Donovan and Alfred W. Andrews for appellants.

Hamilton Ward, Attorney-General ( E.C. Aiken of counsel), for State Industrial Board, respondent.

John F. Wadlin for claimant, respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CARDOZO, Ch. J., POUND, CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN and HUBBS, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Crowell v. American Fruit Growers, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 18, 1930
171 N.E. 774 (N.Y. 1930)

In Matter of Crowell v. American Fruit Growers, Inc. (253 N.Y. 543) it appeared that the claimant's son was employed by the American Fruit Growers, Inc., to solicit business in the village of Milton among other places.

Summary of this case from Shauntz v. Schwegler Brothers, Inc.
Case details for

Matter of Crowell v. American Fruit Growers, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of ALICE CROWELL, Respondent, against AMERICAN…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 18, 1930

Citations

171 N.E. 774 (N.Y. 1930)
171 N.E. 774

Citing Cases

Shauntz v. Schwegler Brothers, Inc.

In Matter of Jessup v. Wrigley ( 250 N.Y. 563) it was held that an employee, whose duty it was to go at night…

Matter of Theyken v. Diplomat Products, Inc.

Decision of the State Industrial Board reversed and matter remitted for the purpose of making an award in…