Opinion
October 9, 1936.
Present — Lazansky, P.J., Young, Hagarty, Adel and Taylor, JJ.
Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Matter of Crossman Company v. Rauch
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 9, 1936
248 App. Div. 885 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Summaries of
Matter of Crossman Company v. Rauch
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 9, 1936
248 App. Div. 885 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for
Matter of Crossman Company v. Rauch
Case Details
Full title:In the Matter of Supplementary Proceedings: CROSSMAN COMPANY, Respondent…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Oct 9, 1936
Citations
248 App. Div. 885 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)