From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Crossman Cadillac v. Bd. of Assessors

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 25, 1976
54 A.D.2d 762 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

October 25, 1976


In a proceeding pursuant to article 7 of the Real Property Tax Law, petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered April 27, 1976, which denied its motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The narrow and only issue in this proceeding is whether petitioner has incorporated, as a part of its real estate, the communications system mentioned and described in its petition (see Matter of Crystal v City of Syracuse, Dept. of Assessment, 47 A.D.2d 29, affd 38 N.Y.2d 883). The trial of this proceeding should be limited to that issue (see CPLR 3212, subd [g]). Gulotta, P.J., Hopkins, Latham, Shapiro and Hawkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Crossman Cadillac v. Bd. of Assessors

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 25, 1976
54 A.D.2d 762 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Matter of Crossman Cadillac v. Bd. of Assessors

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CROSSMAN CADILLAC, INC., Appellant, v. BOARD OF ASSESSORS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 25, 1976

Citations

54 A.D.2d 762 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

Matter of Crossman Cadillac v. Bd., Assessors

I believe that Special Term erred as a matter of law by holding that the communications system which the…