From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Cregg v. Fisselbrand

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 14, 1965
205 N.E.2d 312 (N.Y. 1965)

Opinion

Argued January 13, 1965

Decided January 14, 1965

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, RICHARD ARONSON, J.

Arthur A. Agan for Donald H. Mead, appellant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General ( Herbert H. Smith of counsel), for John P. Lomenzo, as Secretary of State of the State of New York, and Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General, appellants.

Richard D. Kharas for petitioner-respondent.

Eli Gingold, County Attorney ( Nathan I. Share of counsel), for Board of Elections of Onondaga County, respondent.


Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE and BERGAN. Judge DYE dissents and votes to modify by adding to the order of direction "the County of Onondaga" in the recanvass for the reason that the County Chairman of the Democratic party was entitled to be notified of the recanvass by the Board of Elections as required by section 274 of the Election Law. Taking no part: Judge SCILEPPI.


Summaries of

Matter of Cregg v. Fisselbrand

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 14, 1965
205 N.E.2d 312 (N.Y. 1965)
Case details for

Matter of Cregg v. Fisselbrand

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of GEORGE W. CREGG, Respondent, v. HENRY A. FISSELBRAND et…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 14, 1965

Citations

205 N.E.2d 312 (N.Y. 1965)
205 N.E.2d 312
257 N.Y.S.2d 175

Citing Cases

Matter of Washington v. Jenkins

The petition must set forth facts which support the claim that irregularities occurred which altered the…

Matter of Reich v. Power

In our opinion, the original petition, as supplemented by the worksheet served by petitioner on July 8, 1968,…