From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Crawford v. Senkowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 9, 1999
264 A.D.2d 871 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

September 9, 1999

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

James Crawford, Dannemora, petitioner in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Wayne L. Benjamin of counsel), Albany, for respondent.

Before: CARDONA, P.J., MIKOLL, MERCURE, CREW III and PETERS, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

The Attorney-General has advised this court by letter that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and that all references thereto will be expunged from petitioner's institutional record. Because petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is dismissed as moot (see, Matter of Witherspoon v. Goord, 243 A.D.2d 931).

CARDONA, P.J., MIKOLL, MERCURE, CREW III and PETERS, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Crawford v. Senkowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 9, 1999
264 A.D.2d 871 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of Crawford v. Senkowski

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JAMES CRAWFORD, Petitioner, v. DANIEL A. SENKOWSKI, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 9, 1999

Citations

264 A.D.2d 871 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
693 N.Y.S.2d 922

Citing Cases

Matter of Oquendo v. Goord

The Attorney-General has advised this court that the underlying determination has been administratively…