From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Courtesy Lincoln Mercury v. Allen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 16, 1997
240 A.D.2d 574 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

June 16, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Fredman, J.).


Ordered that the appeal from the order entered July 2, 1996, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order entered September 19, 1996, made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order entered September 19, 1996, is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, the motion of Courtesy Lincoln Mercury, Inc., is denied, the cross motion of Herbert Allen is granted, the arbitration award is confirmed, the order entered July 2, 1996, is vacated, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits; and it is further,

Ordered that the appellant is awarded one bill of costs.

Contrary to the finding of the Supreme Court, the arbitrator did not exceed or imperfectly execute his authority in determining, after a hearing, that the petitioner made three or more unsuccessful attempts to repair, inter alia, the transmission and power steering in the used vehicle it had sold to Herbert Allen within the warranty period. The arbitrator's award was supported by substantial evidence in the record and was in accord with due process ( see, e.g., Matter of General Motors Corp. v. Lee, 193 A.D.2d 741; see also, Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. v State of New York, 75 N.Y.2d 175; cf., Matter of Volkswagen of Am. v. Friedman, 166 A.D.2d 709; Chrysler Motors Corp. v. Schachner, 166 A.D.2d 683; General Business Law § 198-b [c] [1], [2] [a]; CPLR 7511 [b] [1] [iii]).

Rosenblatt, J.P., Thompson, Sullivan and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Courtesy Lincoln Mercury v. Allen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 16, 1997
240 A.D.2d 574 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Courtesy Lincoln Mercury v. Allen

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of COURTESY LINCOLN MERCURY, INC., Respondent, v. HERBERT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 16, 1997

Citations

240 A.D.2d 574 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
659 N.Y.S.2d 795

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Amenia Motors v. Bartgis

The appeal from the order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the…

Ford v. Mundy

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without…