From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Countax Realty v. Cty. of Rockland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 18, 1985
114 A.D.2d 956 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

November 18, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Weiner, J.).


Judgment affirmed, with costs.

In this case respondents delayed conveyance of property sold by them at a tax sale to petitioner's predecessor, who then instituted a lawsuit seeking, inter alia, specific performance of their agreement. Respondents and petitioner's predecessor subsequently stipulated to perform the agreement in settlement of that lawsuit. Absent an agreement to the contrary, the purchaser of property at a county tax sale is bound by the terms and conditions set forth in the notice of sale (Baron v Suffolk County, 2 A.D.2d 858). Thus, the agreement to perform in settlement of petitioner's predecessor's lawsuit seeking specific performance of an agreement to sell real property by the county incorporates the terms and conditions of a notice of sale. The notice of sale provided that: "In this case, title to be delivered to the purchaser will be free and clear of the state, county, town and school taxes and assessments owed to the County of Rockland up to and including the date of sale except for the 1981 state, town, county and school taxes". Accordingly, petitioner's claim that it owed no taxes that accrued before the sale date in 1981 is without basis.

We have considered petitioner's other contention and find it to be without basis as well. Lazer, J.P., Gibbons, Niehoff and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Countax Realty v. Cty. of Rockland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 18, 1985
114 A.D.2d 956 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Matter of Countax Realty v. Cty. of Rockland

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of COUNTAX REALTY CORPORATION, Appellant, v. COUNTY OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 18, 1985

Citations

114 A.D.2d 956 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Matter of Littlefield v. Gasser

Petitioner, who does not dispute that this information was relayed, did not communicate his dissatisfaction…