From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Correa v. Hanslmaier

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 22, 1996
224 A.D.2d 855 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

February 22, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Sullivan County.


Petitioner is an inmate at Woodbourne Correctional Facility in Sullivan County. As the result of an incident in which petitioner entered the nursing station without authorization and asked a nurse in a threatening manner why she had him locked up, petitioner was found guilty of interfering with prison employees and harassment. Initially, we reject petitioner's contention that this determination is not supported by substantial evidence. The misbehavior report, combined with the testimony of the nurse and the doctor who witnessed the exchange, constitutes substantial evidence supporting the determination. In addition, we do not find that the mistaken date on the misbehavior report warrants annulment of the determination since petitioner indicated at the hearing that he knew the correct date of the incident and, therefore, was not prejudiced by the error. Finally, we have considered petitioner's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Mikoll, J.P., Mercure, White, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Correa v. Hanslmaier

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 22, 1996
224 A.D.2d 855 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Matter of Correa v. Hanslmaier

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LIONEL CORREA, Petitioner, v. ROBERT HANSLMAIER, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 22, 1996

Citations

224 A.D.2d 855 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
638 N.Y.S.2d 206

Citing Cases

Matter of Osorio v. McClellan

" We reject petitioner's assertion that the determination was not supported by substantial evidence. The…

In the Matter of Werner v. Philips

The Hearing Officer then offered petitioner a two-day adjournment in order to prepare a defense based upon…