Opinion
March 2, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Dunn, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
A constitutional claim that hinges upon factual issues reviewable at the administrative level must first be addressed to the administrative agency so that a necessary factual record can be established (see, Matter of Fichera v City of New York, 145 A.D.2d 482, 484). The mere assertion that a constitutional right is involved will not excuse the failure to pursue established administrative remedies that can provide the requested relief (see, Matter of Fichera v City of New York, supra).
There is no record in this case as to whether there was a merger of the lot in question with an adjoining lot (see, Matter of Barkus v Kern, 160 A.D.2d 694). Under the circumstances of this case, the established administrative remedies could have provided the requested relief. Thus, the failure to pursue these remedies cannot be excused. Accordingly, the proceeding was properly dismissed owing to the petitioner's failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Eiber and Miller, JJ., concur.