Opinion
July 24, 1989
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County.
Adjudged that the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
The extraordinary remedy of a writ of prohibition does not properly lie under the instant circumstances in view of the apparent lack of merit of the petitioner's contentions and the availability of an adequate remedy at law (see, Matter of Lipari v Owens, 70 N.Y.2d 731; Matter of Molea v Marasco, 64 N.Y.2d 718). Mollen, P.J., Mangano, Thompson and Spatt, JJ., concur.