From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Consumer's Poultry v. Podberesky Bros

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1935
244 App. Div. 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Opinion

April, 1935.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Scudder, JJ.


Order adjudging judgment debtor, by its secretary and treasurer, guilty of contempt in supplementary proceedings and imposing a fine of $1,533.13 modified by reducing one item in the fine, consisting of the amount of the judgment, from $1,003.13 to $250, thus reducing the total of the fine imposed to $780, and as so modified unanimously affirmed, without costs. The showing with respect to "actual loss or injury" resulting "to a party to an action or special proceeding, by reason of the misconduct proved against the offender" was insufficient to justify a fining of the offender the amount of the judgment. The limit of the judgment in respect of that element was $250. The fine, so far as it related to costs and expenses, was proper. (Judiciary Law, § 773; Weddle v. Grzeczezak, No. 2, 189 App. Div. 493; Matter of Starr v. Morange, 119 Misc. 376; Matter of Schwortz v. Sill, 85 id. 55; Whitman v. Haines, 51 Hun, 640; affd. on opinion of Brady, J., at Special Term, 119 N.Y. 639.)


Summaries of

Matter of Consumer's Poultry v. Podberesky Bros

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1935
244 App. Div. 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Case details for

Matter of Consumer's Poultry v. Podberesky Bros

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Supplementary Proceedings: CONSUMER'S POULTRY DEALERS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1935

Citations

244 App. Div. 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Citing Cases

Matter of Williamson v. Drogaris

As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. This was the limit of the fine that could be imposed…