From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Constantine v. Leto

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 7, 1991
77 N.Y.2d 975 (N.Y. 1991)

Opinion

Argued March 27, 1991

Decided May 7, 1991

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, Edward S. Conway, J.

Peter Gerstenzang for appellant.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Joseph Koczaja, O. Peter Sherwood and Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney (Mark Dwyer and Thomas B. Litsky of counsel), amicus curiae.


Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Thomas E. Mercure at the Appellate Division ( 157 A.D.2d 376).

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA. Taking no part: Judge TITONE.


Summaries of

Constantine v. Leto

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 7, 1991
77 N.Y.2d 975 (N.Y. 1991)
Case details for

Constantine v. Leto

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of THOMAS A. CONSTANTINE, as Superintendent of the Division…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 7, 1991

Citations

77 N.Y.2d 975 (N.Y. 1991)
571 N.Y.S.2d 906
575 N.E.2d 392

Citing Cases

People v. Juarez

To the extent that our prior decisions could be read as endorsing a broader rule that would vest nonparties…

People v. Juarez

To the extent that our prior decisions could be read as endorsing a broader rule that would vest nonparties…