From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Connolly v. Stand

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 18, 1948
82 N.E.2d 399 (N.Y. 1948)

Opinion

Argued October 14, 1948

Decided October 18, 1948

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, COHALAN, J.

Paul L. Ross, Hyman N. Glickstein and Hyman Joseph for Frances S. Connolly, appellant.

John P. McGrath, Corporation Counsel ( W. Bernard Richland, Bernard Friedlander and Victor F. Condello of counsel), for Murray W. Stand and others, respondents.

Reginald S. Hardy for James Clarke and another, respondents.

H.H. Nordlinger, Harold Riegelman and Robert C. Isaacs for Robert W. Dowling, intervener, respondent.


Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE and FULD, JJ. Taking no part: THACHER, J.


Summaries of

Matter of Connolly v. Stand

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 18, 1948
82 N.E.2d 399 (N.Y. 1948)
Case details for

Matter of Connolly v. Stand

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of FRANCES S. CONNOLLY et al., Appellant…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 18, 1948

Citations

82 N.E.2d 399 (N.Y. 1948)
82 N.E.2d 399

Citing Cases

Salzman v. Impellitteri

that "the provisions of this article [IX] shall not be deemed to restrict the power of the legislature to…

Salzman v. Impellitteri

ides that "the provisions of this article [IX] shall not be deemed to restrict the power of the legislature…