From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Commr. of Soc. Serv. v. Currie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 9, 1992
182 A.D.2d 433 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

April 9, 1992

Appeal from the Family Court, New York County (George Jurow, F.C.J.).


These two unrelated petitions present the same legal issue: whether, on a petition for upward modification of a child support award, where the family is receiving public assistance, the petitioner must show an increase in the child's needs in addition to an increase in the respondent parent's income. We hold that neither the relevant statutes nor decisional law imposes such a requirement, and accordingly, reverse (see, Family Ct Act § 413, 415; see generally, Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. v Segarra, 78 N.Y.2d 220).

Each of these petitions involves an application for upward modification of a support award based solely on an increase in the respondent father's income. In both cases, the child is a recipient of public assistance pursuant to the Federal Aid to Families with Dependent Children program. In each case the Family Court relied on Matter of Masten v Masten ( 150 A.D.2d 693, lv denied 74 N.Y.2d 611) and Katz v Katz ( 125 A.D.2d 549) to hold that proof of an increase in respondent's salary alone is insufficient to warrant an increase in support, and that petitioner must also show that the child's needs have increased. In each case the Family Court also found that the child's needs had actually decreased since the date of the prior support order. To support this finding, the Court relied on the fact that the prorated reduction in the family's assistance grant allocable to the dependent child had been reduced by $2 per week in the Jacobs application and $8 per week in the Costello application.

We hold that the Family Court's reliance on the standards discussed in Katz (supra), which involved modification of a support provision in a separation agreement that survived a divorce decree, and Masten (supra), which involved special circumstances, including non-disclosure of assets and payment of private school and college tuition, is misplaced (see, Matter of Brescia v Fitts, 56 N.Y.2d 132). In Brescia, the Court held that where an upward revision of a support award involves the right of the child to receive adequate support, a showing of increased need is not required (supra, at 139). Where, as here, the income level of the custodial parent places the dependent child in a family living below the poverty level as set by the United States Department of Health and Human Services, a significant increase in the salary of the non-custodial parent constitutes a sufficient change in circumstances to warrant an increase in the support award in the best interests of the child (see generally, Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. v Segarra, supra).

In the application on behalf of Barbara Jacobs, the father's income had increased from $293 to approximately $366 per week. His dependent child was receiving $37 per week in public assistance and $30 per week in child support at the time of the petitions.

In the Costello application, the father's income had increased from $274 to over $500 per week. His dependent child was receiving $33 per week in public assistance and $20 per week in child support.

We are of the opinion that the petitioners in both cases are entitled to an opportunity to prove that the child's best interests warrant an increase in court-ordered child support based solely upon the increase in income of the non-custodial parent.

On remand, the Court should apply the provisions of the recently enacted "Child Support Standards Act" (Family Ct Act § 413), even though in the Costello application the petition was filed prior to the effective date of section 413 as amended (see, Gelb v Brown, 163 A.D.2d 189).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Milonas, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Commr. of Soc. Serv. v. Currie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 9, 1992
182 A.D.2d 433 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Matter of Commr. of Soc. Serv. v. Currie

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 9, 1992

Citations

182 A.D.2d 433 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
582 N.Y.S.2d 86

Citing Cases

Matter of Wilson v. Brunsting

Those provisions incorporated and merged the parties' stipulation, thus the applicable test was whether there…

In the Matter of Kent v. Kent

Thus, we find it compelling to address petitioner's application for an upward modification. While we leave…