Opinion
February 26, 1996
Appeal from the Family Court, Kings County (Lubow, J.).
Ordered that the dispositional order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
We agree with the Family Court's determination that the subject child is a neglected child within the meaning of Family Court Act § 1012 (f) (see, Matter of Baby Boy E., 187 A.D.2d 512). Furthermore, the dispositional order is in the best interests of the child (see, Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. [Trudy I.] v. Leona W., 192 A.D.2d 602). Mangano, P.J., Bracken, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.