From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Collin Q

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 24, 2003
307 A.D.2d 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

93582

Decided and Entered: July 24, 2003.

Appeals from two orders of the Family Court of Warren County (Breen, J.), entered December 24, 2002, which granted petitioner's applications, in two proceedings pursuant to Family Ct Act article 10, for temporary orders of protection.

Thomas Marcelle, Delmar, for appellants.

Karen Judd Matt, Warren County Department of Social Services, Lake George, for respondent.

Kara Dopman, Law Guardian, Glens Falls.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Carpinello, Mugglin, Rose and Kane, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


Respondents, the parents of Collin (born in 1992), had been home schooling their son for at least three years. Petitioner commenced these separate proceedings against respondents under Family Ct Act article 10, alleging, in essence, educational neglect by reason of respondents' failure to file the necessary quarterly reports and the latest individualized home instruction plan. Following a hearing, Family Court issued temporary orders of protection which directed respondents to "[t]ake the necessary and proper steps to enroll and ensure Collin's attendance at a public, private or parochial school of their choice."

The sole issue raised on this appeal, as defined in their brief, is whether, before trial and without proof of actual neglect, the government can interfere with parents' constitutional rights to direct their child's education. This appeal is moot for two reasons. First, the temporary order expired by its own terms on May 8, 2003. Second, during the pendency of this appeal, the neglect proceeding came to trial, at which time respondents admitted their failure to provide Collin with an education in accordance with Education Law article 65, and an order was entered April 18, 2003 adjudging Collin a neglected child within the definition of Family Ct Act § 1012 (see Matter of Curtis N., 302 A.D.2d 803, 803; Matter of Senator NN., 305 A.D.2d 819, 820, 759 N.Y.S.2d 257, 258). We find that no exception to the mootness doctrine applies herein (see Matter of Hearst Corp. v. Clyne, 50 N.Y.2d 707, 714-715; see also Matter of Daily News v. Teresi, 275 A.D.2d 812, 814).

Mercure, J.P., Carpinello, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Collin Q

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 24, 2003
307 A.D.2d 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Matter of Collin Q

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF COLLIN Q., ALLEGED TO BE A NEGLECTED CHILD. WARREN COUNTY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 24, 2003

Citations

307 A.D.2d 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
762 N.Y.S.2d 528

Citing Cases

Kiearah P. v. Angel R

Thereafter, respondent consented to a finding of neglect in the underlying neglect proceeding and, consistent…

In re Cheyenne

In connection with that order, the parties agreed that Tylor would reside in the family home with respondent.…