From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Cohen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 25, 1998
255 A.D.2d 862 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

November 25, 1998

Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.


Claimant was employed as a warehouse worker for a wine and spirits wholesaler when he was terminated for failing to perform a work assignment. Claimant testified that he forgot about the assignment after he became involved in a lengthy conversation with a co-worker about video games. Several weeks earlier, claimant had been fired for failing to carry out an assignment and walking away from his supervisor when questioned; however, claimant pleaded for another chance that time and was reinstated. Employee behavior that is detrimental to the employer's interest and persists despite repeated warnings may be construed as disqualifying misconduct (see, Matter of Depena [Commissioner of Labor], 249 A.D.2d 611). Upon review of the record, we find substantial evidence to support the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board's ruling that claimant lost his employment under disqualifying circumstances.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Yesawich Jr., Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Cohen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 25, 1998
255 A.D.2d 862 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Matter of Cohen

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of KEITH A. COHEN, Appellant. COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 25, 1998

Citations

255 A.D.2d 862 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
681 N.Y.S.2d 370

Citing Cases

Matter of Stanton

We affirm. Substantial evidence supports the conclusion that, under the circumstances presented to the Board,…

Matter of Schienberg

We affirm. Substantial evidence supports the conclusion that, under the circumstances presented in this…