From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Citizens for an Orderly Energy Policy (COEP) v. County of Suffolk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 20, 1982
90 A.D.2d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Opinion

October 20, 1982


Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Copertino, J.), entered October 8, 1982, which, inter alia, granted an application to direct the Suffolk County Board of Elections to omit an advisory referendum regarding the Shoreham Nuclear Power Plant from the ballot of November 2, 1982. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. We agree with the conclusion of Special Term that in the absence of express constitutional or statutory authority, the County of Suffolk may not provide for an advisory referendum. No such authority exists. Hence, the Suffolk County Legislature is without authority to place the proposed referendum on the general election ballot. Mollen, P.J., Damiani, Niehoff, Rubin and Boyers, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Citizens for an Orderly Energy Policy (COEP) v. County of Suffolk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 20, 1982
90 A.D.2d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)
Case details for

Citizens for an Orderly Energy Policy (COEP) v. County of Suffolk

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CITIZENS FOR AN ORDERLY ENERGY POLICY (COEP) et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 20, 1982

Citations

90 A.D.2d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Citing Cases

Woodburn v. Vill. of Owego

The parties seem to agree that the Village is not permitted to conduct an advisory referendum at an election…

Woodburn v. Vill. of Owego

As noted above, an "advisory referendum" is not authorized in the absence of express statutory authority (see…