From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Cleveland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 2, 1996
224 A.D.2d 1038 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

February 2, 1996

Appeal from the Erie County Family Court, Townsend, J.

Present — Pine, J.P., Wesley, Callahan, Davis and Boehm, JJ.


Case held, decision reserved and matter remitted to Erie County Family Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Although Family Court stated the reasons for its determination on the record, the order of disposition does not comply with Family Court Act § 754 (2) because it does not set forth "the court's reasons for the particular disposition." The requirement of the statute is mandatory (Matter of Tynisah S., 201 A.D.2d 958), requiring remittitur for amendment of the order to comply with the statutory mandate (see, Matter of Robert U., 189 A.D.2d 1014, lv denied 82 N.Y.2d 653, appeal dismissed 82 N.Y.2d 748).


Summaries of

Matter of Cleveland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 2, 1996
224 A.D.2d 1038 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Matter of Cleveland

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CLEVELAND A.H., a Person Alleged to be in Need of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 2, 1996

Citations

224 A.D.2d 1038 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
637 N.Y.S.2d 574