From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Clearview Gardens Pool Club v. Foley

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 4, 1964
200 N.E.2d 217 (N.Y. 1964)

Opinion

Argued May 4, 1964

Decided June 4, 1964

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department.

Leo A. Larkin, Corporation Counsel ( Alfred Weinstein and Seymour B. Quel of counsel), for appellants.

Gustave A. de Lemos and Murray E. Winnick for respondent.

Jay L. Schwimer and Morrell Schwimer for William Grodzinski and Florence Grodzinski, intervenors-appellants.

Max H. Lome for remaining intervenors-appellants.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN.


Summaries of

Matter of Clearview Gardens Pool Club v. Foley

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 4, 1964
200 N.E.2d 217 (N.Y. 1964)
Case details for

Matter of Clearview Gardens Pool Club v. Foley

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CLEARVIEW GARDENS POOL CLUB, INC., Respondent, v. MAX H…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 4, 1964

Citations

200 N.E.2d 217 (N.Y. 1964)
200 N.E.2d 217
251 N.Y.S.2d 38

Citing Cases

Bella Vista Apt. Co. v. Bennett

Next, Bella Vista turned to the courts for relief. It sued the City seeking to (1) annul the BSA's…

Niagara Recycling v. Niagara

ult in a closure of these facilities and an impairment of these vested rights (see Nettleton Co. v. Diamond,…