From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Clary v. Constanza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 2, 2003
765 N.Y.S.2d 312 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

CAF 00-02342

October 2, 2003.

Appeal from an order of Family Court, Monroe County (Miles, J.), entered September 26, 2000, which determined that respondent is not a necessary party to the proceeding.

EDWARD J. NOWAK, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (CHRISTINE F. REDFIELD OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

ROBERT J. ST. GEORGE, ROCHESTER, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

ARDETH L. HOUDE, LAW GUARDIAN, ROCHESTER, FOR STEPHANIE C.

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., GREEN, PINE, SCUDDER, AND HAYES, JJ.


ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Clary v. Constanza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 2, 2003
765 N.Y.S.2d 312 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Matter of Clary v. Constanza

Case Details

Full title:MATTER OF STEVEN M. CLARY, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. TAMARA L. CONSTANZA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 2, 2003

Citations

765 N.Y.S.2d 312 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)