From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Civilette v. Caccamise

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 18, 1973
42 A.D.2d 1026 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)

Opinion

October 18, 1973

Appeal from the Chautauqua Special Term.

Present — Goldman, P.J., Marsh, Moule, Cardamone and Simons, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The burden of proof to establish the invalidity of these petitions (Election Law, § 145) rests on the appellants who filed objections to them ( Matter of Hooper v. Power, 17 A.D.2d 816, affd. 12 N.Y.2d 764). The record before us is incomplete and does not even include the designating petitions objected to by appellants. Such proof is insufficient to demonstrate a lack of substantial compliance with section 138 of the Election Law. Absent any allegation of fraud, concededly not here in issue, we conclude that upon this record the trial court properly directed the Board of Elections to place petitioner's name on the ballot (cf. Matter of Rosen v. McNab, 25 N.Y.2d 798) for the general election November 6, 1973. (Order entered Oct. 16, 1973.)


Summaries of

Matter of Civilette v. Caccamise

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 18, 1973
42 A.D.2d 1026 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)
Case details for

Matter of Civilette v. Caccamise

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DAVID M. CIVILETTE, Respondent, v. GEORGE CACCAMISE et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 18, 1973

Citations

42 A.D.2d 1026 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)

Citing Cases

Matter of Maguire v. Bennett

The burden of proof in an invalidation proceeding lies with the petitioner who filed objections thereto.…

La Mendola v. Mahoney

Special Term correctly held that the designating petition substantially complied with section 135 of the…