From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Civil Service v. Nassau County

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 20, 2001
280 A.D.2d 599 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Argued January 23, 2001

February 20, 2001.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Nassau County Public Employment Relations Board, dated January 4, 1999, which, inter alia, granted the petition of the intervenor Sheriffs' Officers Association, Inc., to be certified as the negotiating representative of certain classes of correction officers employed by the County of Nassau.

Nancy E. Hoffman, Albany, N.Y. (Jerome Lefkowitz of counsel), for petitioner.

Thomas A. Toscano, Mineola, N.Y., for intervenor-respondent.

Before: RITTER, J.P., ALTMAN, FRIEDMANN, SMITH, JJ.


DECISION JUDGMENT

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

In reviewing a decision of a public employment relations board, it is well settled that "the function of [this] court is not to determine de novo the best or most likely or most advantageous bargaining unit, but is restricted to a finding of whether PERB's decision is supported by substantial evidence * * * or is arbitrary and capricious" (Matter of County of Erie v. New York State Pub. Empl. Relations Bd., 247 A.D.2d 671, 672; Matter of Bivens v. Helsby, 55 A.D.2d 230, 232). The decision of the Nassau County Public Employment Relations Board (hereinafter PERB) granting the petition for certification of the Sheriffs' Officers Association (hereinafter SOA) to fragment and create a separate bargaining unit was neither arbitrary nor capricious (see, Civil Service Law § 207).

There is evidence in the record to support the PERB finding that the correction officers share a community of interest (see, County of Erie and Sheriff of Erie County, 29 PERB. 3031), that the department heads of the Sheriff's Department have the power to make effective recommendations with respect to the terms and conditions of corrections officers' employment, and that the fragmentation of the proposed unit will not cause administrative inconvenience (see, Bivens v. Helsby, supra; Central School District No. 1 v. St. Lawrence County, 1 PERB. 399.89). Thus, substantial evidence supports the PERB finding that the SOA was the most appropriate unit (see, Malone Central School District, 1 PERB. 399.29).

The petitioner's remaining arguments do not require a different result.


Summaries of

Matter of Civil Service v. Nassau County

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 20, 2001
280 A.D.2d 599 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Matter of Civil Service v. Nassau County

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF CIVIL SERVICE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, INC., ETC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 20, 2001

Citations

280 A.D.2d 599 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
721 N.Y.S.2d 239

Citing Cases

In re Village of Lake Success

The determination of the respondent New York State Public Employment Relations Board (hereinafter PERB),…