Opinion
Argued October 21, 1999
December 20, 1999
In a condemnation proceeding, the claimants Peter Bournakis, Julia Bournakis, Fourth Avenue Automobile Service, Ltd., and Universal Metal Machine Works, Inc., appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Scholnick, J.), entered June 16, 1998, as granted the motion of the City of New York to dismiss the consequential fixture claim of Universal Metal Machine Works, Inc., and denied the latter's cross motion for leave to file a late or amended claim.
Goldstein, Goldstein Rikon, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Michael J. Goldstein of counsel), for appellants.
Michael D. Hess, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Paul Rephen, Elizabeth Dvorkin, Robert Pfeffer, and Fred Kolikoff of counsel), for respondent.
CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, DANIEL F. LUCIANO and NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the appeal by claimants Peter Bournakis, Julia Bournakis, and Fourth Avenue Automobile Service, Ltd., is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as they are not aggrieved by the order appealed from (see, CPLR 5511); and it is further,
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from by the Universal Metal Machine Works, Inc., with costs.
We agree with the Supreme Court that the consequential fixture claim filed by Universal Metal Machine Works, Inc. (hereinafter Universal), did not constitute an amendment to its direct claim, and therefore was untimely. The court's denial of Universal's motion to file a late or amended claim was proper in light of Universal's failure to provide a reasonable excuse for not seeking to do so earlier (see, Grandinetti v. Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 139 A.D.2d 619, affd 74 N.Y.2d 785 ; see also, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. v. Bontrager Realty, 191 A.D.2d 1002 ; Metropolitan Transp. Auth. v. Pizzuti, 156 A.D.2d 546 ).
Universal's remaining contentions are without merit.
O'BRIEN, J.P., ALTMAN, LUCIANO, and SMITH, JJ., concur.