From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of City of Rochester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 27, 1969
32 A.D.2d 882 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Opinion

June 27, 1969

Appeal from the Monroe Trial Term.

Present — Del Vecchio, J.P., Marsh, Gabrielli, Moule and Henry, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Since the property taken was not a specialty, depreciated replacement cost was not the best measure of its worth. The economic approach was the proper method of determining value. The proof received amply supports the court's award when this method is employed. We adopt $35,400 as the fair market value of the land, the valuation found by the trial court. We find a fair net annual rental from the building to be $9,784, after deducting 8% for vacancies and $2,912 for expenses. Attributing to the land $2,124, a return of 6%, the balance of net income of $7,660 we have capitalized at 13%, which produces a building value of $58,923. In view of these found land and improvement values ($35,400 plus $58,923), we affirm the award of $94,383.30.


Summaries of

Matter of City of Rochester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 27, 1969
32 A.D.2d 882 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
Case details for

Matter of City of Rochester

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the CITY OF ROCHESTER, Appellant-Respondent, Relative to…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 27, 1969

Citations

32 A.D.2d 882 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
302 N.Y.S.2d 184

Citing Cases

Rochester Smelting & Refining Co. v. State

This was error. Unless a building is either a specialty or unique, an award cannot be based solely on the…