Opinion
Argued October 15, 1936
Decided November 24, 1936
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
John W. Davis, Daniel J. Kenefick and Luke W. Finlay for Warren Leslie et al., appellants. Francis S. Bensel, David Barnett and W. Frederick Knecht for Central Hanover Bank and Trust Company et al., appellants.
Paul Windels, Corporation Counsel ( Phillip W. Haberman, Jr., Paxton Blair and Philip L. Wellens of counsel), for respondent.
A single question of power in the Supreme Court is involved in the certified question.
Upon this record we find no abuse (as matter of law) of the discretionary power of the Supreme Court. ( Hatch v. Central Nat. Bank, 78 N.Y. 487, 489; Matter of Tilden, 98 N.Y. 434, 439; Ladd v. Stevenson, 112 N.Y. 325.) This leads to an affirmance.
We leave the merits to be determined upon the new trial which has been granted.
The order should be affirmed, with costs, and the question certified answered in the affirmative.
LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, CROUCH, LOUGHRAN and FINCH, JJ., concur; CRANE, Ch. J., taking no part.
Order affirmed, etc.