From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 14, 1936
1 N.E.2d 467 (N.Y. 1936)

Opinion

Argued March 3, 1936

Decided April 14, 1936

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

H. Spencer Bregoff for appellant. Paul Windels, Corporation Counsel ( Lewis Orgel, Paxton Blair and Reuben Levy of counsel), for respondent.


We are not in accord with the ruling below that private easements were created in damage parcel No. 2 as laid out on the map filed by the appellant's predecessor in title. The lots conveyed by the appellant with reference to this map front on other streets as shown thereon, do not abut upon damage parcel No. 2, and do not require the use of any part of damage parcel No. 2 for access to the city system of public streets.

The orders, in so far as they relate to damage parcel No. 2, should be reversed, with costs to the appellant in this court and in the Appellate Division, and the proceeding remitted to the Special Term for further action.

CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, CROUCH, LOUGHRAN and FINCH, JJ., concur.

Ordered accordingly.


Summaries of

Matter of City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 14, 1936
1 N.E.2d 467 (N.Y. 1936)
Case details for

Matter of City of New York

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 14, 1936

Citations

1 N.E.2d 467 (N.Y. 1936)
1 N.E.2d 467

Citing Cases

De Ruscio v. Jackson

This requires proof that the deed from the original subdividing grantor referred to the subdivision map or…