From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of City of New York v. Gentile

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 2, 1998
248 A.D.2d 382 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

March 2, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Appelman, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the application to quash is granted.

The Supreme Court erred in granting the defendant's application to discover certain police records in connection with his pending criminal action since there is no statutory basis for such discovery (see, Matter of Pirro v. LaCava, 230 A.D.2d 909, 910). Discovery which is unavailable pursuant to statute may not be ordered based on principles of due process because "there is no general constitutional right to discovery in criminal cases" (Matter of Miller v. Schwartz, 72 N.Y.2d 869, 870, citing Weatherford v. Bursey, 429 U.S. 545, 559). Therefore, the petitioner's motion to quash the subpoena should have been granted.

O'Brien, J. P., Ritter, Thompson, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of City of New York v. Gentile

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 2, 1998
248 A.D.2d 382 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Matter of City of New York v. Gentile

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. KEVIN GENTILE, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 2, 1998

Citations

248 A.D.2d 382 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
669 N.Y.S.2d 854

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

DOC further argues that although defendant may obtain documents if they qualify as exculpatory evidence, he…

People v. Jackson

Although legislative policy directs disclosure of evidence mandated by fundamental fairness (see People v.…