From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 25, 1916
111 N.E. 1086 (N.Y. 1916)

Opinion

Argued January 6, 1916

Decided January 25, 1916

Philip M. Bromberg and Hugo Hirsh for appellant.

Lamar Hardy, Corporation Counsel ( Andrew C. Troy and Howard L. Campion of counsel), for respondent.


The unanimous affirmance of the order confirming the report of the commissioners of estimate and assessment prevents the consideration on this appeal of the questions presented by the appellant; order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., HISCOCK, CHASE, COLLIN, HOGAN, CARDOZO and SEABURY, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 25, 1916
111 N.E. 1086 (N.Y. 1916)
Case details for

Matter of City of New York

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of the CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 25, 1916

Citations

111 N.E. 1086 (N.Y. 1916)
111 N.E. 1086