From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 25, 1932
260 N.Y. 583 (N.Y. 1932)

Opinion

Argued October 5, 1932

Decided October 25, 1932

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

Arthur J.W. Hilly, Corporation Counsel ( Joseph F. Mulqueen, Jr., Joel J. Squier, J. Joseph Lilly and Reuben Levy of counsel), for appellant.

Clarence J. Shearn, Charles J. Nehrbas and Martin Lippman for Charles E. Hughes, Jr., as ancillary receiver of American Bond and Mortgage Company, respondent.

Henry Herz and Isaac E. Bermant for Hyman Steinberg et al., respondents.

Louis Salant, Joseph J. Cunningham and Eli S. Wolbarst for Fannie A. Kallis et al., respondents.

Reginald S. Hardy for Kate Rubino, as executrix of Joseph C. Rubino, deceased, respondent.

Leffert Holz, Benjamin F. Schreiber and Herman Schrier for Milton Brinn et al., respondents.

Charles Lamb and Edmund J. Delany for David Davis et al., respondents.

Sidney A. Clarkson, Albert A. Hovell and Harry W. McChesney for Harry W. Perlman, respondent.

Nathan L. Goldstein, George Schenker and Irving S. Dorf for Isabel Blumborg et al., respondents.

S.G. Nissenson for Nathan Himowich, respondent.

Francis P. O'Connor and Edward W. Murphy for James N. Webb et al., respondents.

Charles B. Fernald and F.W.H. Adams for the Chase National Bank of the City of New York et al., respondents.

Dominic L. O'Reilly, James Regan FitzGerald and A.M. Frumberg for Max Horowitz et al., and Marknew Realty Co., Inc., respondents.

Leslie J. Tompkins, Dominic L. O'Reilly and James Regan FitzGerald for Bernard L. Meyer et al., respondents.

Ira B. Livingston for Oscar Lloyd Realty Corporation, respondent. Samuel Rubin and William W. Conrad for Stancar Realty Corporation et al., respondents.

Ignatius Castelli for Charles Lampedusa, respondent.

Louis A. Rosenstein and Maurice Janklow for Fanny E. Krooks, respondent.

Harry Lesser for Samuel M. Krauthamer, respondent.

Barnett E. Kopelman and Alexander Liebman for I. Ptaschnik Son, Inc., respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion. (See 260 N.Y. 658.)

Concur: POUND, Ch. J., CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN and HUBBS, JJ. Not sitting: CROUCH, J.


Summaries of

Matter of City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 25, 1932
260 N.Y. 583 (N.Y. 1932)
Case details for

Matter of City of New York

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of the CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 25, 1932

Citations

260 N.Y. 583 (N.Y. 1932)
184 N.E. 102

Citing Cases

People ex Rel. Hotel Paramount Corp. v. Chambers

The manner of determining what portion of the sales prices and of the yearly income is attributable to the…

Westbury Drive-In v. Bd. of Assessors

Whichever definition is used, there can be no question that this drive-in theatre, which is one of two in the…