From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 14, 1936
1 N.E.2d 982 (N.Y. 1936)

Opinion

Argued March 3, 1936

Decided April 14, 1936

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

Paul Windels, Corporation Counsel ( Phillip W. Haberman, Jr., Paxton Blair and Reuben Levy of counsel), for appellant.

Clinton T. Roe and Charles P. Kramer for Florence S. Barto et al., respondents.

Abraham Daniels for Northprince Boulevard Holding Co., Inc., respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs. The points raised on the appeal are not before us as not having been presented on the trial. No opinion.

Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, CROUCH, LOUGHRAN and FINCH, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 14, 1936
1 N.E.2d 982 (N.Y. 1936)
Case details for

Matter of City of New York

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 14, 1936

Citations

1 N.E.2d 982 (N.Y. 1936)
1 N.E.2d 982

Citing Cases

Matter of City of New York

Decree, insofar as appealed from affirmed, with costs. In our opinion, the condemnation award at bar is…